Catchment chaos: Greens condemn stress for families as Labour Council u-turn

Greens have welcomed news that the secondary school catchment areas for the city will remain unchanged, following months of lobbying from local parents and students concerned about the negative impact of new proposals.

Local Green Councillors have slammed the Labour Council for failing to adequately manage a ‘chaotic’ schools allocations process, after proposals to change school catchment areas drew intense criticism from parents across the city.

Green Councillor Alex Phillips, spokesperson for Children, Young People and Skills Committee, has criticised Labour for making such a late u-turn and for failing to respond to widespread concerns from parents earlier on in the process.

hertford infants petition

The Green Group of Councillors have supported petitions from parents opposed to planned reductions of form sizes in local primary schools, calling for a proper investigation into the impact of these changes.

Councillor Phillips said:

“After defending their unworkable proposals for school catchments for months, against the repeated concerns of parents, students and Councillors alike, the Labour Council has now done a complete u-turn on their failed school admissions plans. These included deeply unpopular proposals to cripple two of our best performing primary schools, Hertford and Benfield, by reducing them to just one class – hardly a sustainable position; and the pursuit of a deeply flawed set of catchment changes, with seemingly little engagement with the city’s existing secondary schools, who have since offered to extend their intake.

“Whilst the information from the secondary school heads that they were willing to expand their classes is to be welcomed, parents and students in their droves have come time and time again to the Labour Council explaining that their proposed catchment plans were untenable for local communities. It has taken months of banging this drum for Labour to finally listen. Parents will be breathing a sigh of relief, but after months of campaigning, the Labour Council’s belated thanks for their input will not erase the stress this has caused our city’s parents and young people, who have been left in limbo for months.”

Advertisements

Drum out abuse


Councillors Alex Phillips and Amanda Knight comment on the issue of violence against 
women and girls following a march in aid of local domestic abuse charity, RISE, this month

RISE March Saturday 9 Dec 2017

Green Councillors Alex Phillips, Amanda Knight and Pete West joined the RISE anti-domestic violence ‘Drum Out Abuse’ march this December

 

Councillor Alex Phillips

Domestic and sexual violence has never in my memory received so much media attention, with waves of recognition such as the #metoo campaign which triggered many women and men in Hollywood –as well as women in politics on both sides of the Atlantic – to come forward and confront perpetrators of historic sexual abuse.

It’s fantastic that some victims of sexual abuse are coming forward and speaking out about these traumas and the horrific crimes against them and I very much hope that it encourages more victims to have the courage to confront their abusers. Disclosing abuse is an act of immense bravery, but sadly, the price many women pay for revealing and exposing sexual harassment is, unacceptably, further harassment and abuse. It’s clear that we still have some way to go. The march organised by domestic abuse charity RISE in Brighton was a vital opportunity to make some noise on an issue over which many people find themselves utterly silenced.

One in four women experience domestic or sexual abuse in their lifetimes. This seems to be an entrenched societal problem yet there aren’t enough people talking about it seriously, and even though more people are now coming forward, the Brighton and Hove City Council has recently admitted that support services cannot keep up with the increase in demand.

We know that the festive season is particularly concerning because it is a period of time when more domestic and sexual violence takes place. We don’t want to see victims left without the support that they need. That’s why we are asking the council to urgently look again at their budget and to find extra money to put into the services that support these victims. They cannot and should not be left alone.

Councillor Amanda Knight

Violence and sexual abuse is a reality some of us find hard to talk about – meaning it is all too often pushed aside. Violence and sexual assault disproportionately affects more woman and girls than it does men and boys, though both are equally as awful as each other.

I attended a march on Saturday 10th December 2017 for RISE, an amazing charity in Brighton and Hove that supports people affected by domestic abuse. They were ending their 16 days of activism to raise awareness of people who are affected by this awful debilitating abuse. It was a moving – and necessary –  event. There are other charities out there that help support survivors of domestic abuse and sexual violence too, such as the Survivors Network, Brighton Women’s Centre, rapecrisis.org.uk and the Oasis project.  But as cash injections and resources to many Council funded services, including refuges, continue to dwindle, each of these organisations become a greater lifeline for people needing their support – but also find themselves ever more stretched.

In Brighton and Hove recent figures show that up to 7,639 women and girls are estimated to have experienced sexual assault. There were 4,703 domestic violence and 821 sexual offences reported to the police in 2016/17, an increase of 28% – and 115% respectively since 2013/14. However police recorded data is likely to be under represented. Behind every statistic is a person carrying the pain of abuse– and behind those statistics will be more women and girls who are unable to speak out.

As we face up to the problem we must also take the bold steps that are needed to prevent sexual violence, discrimination and abuse. Feelings of shame, guilt, blame and fear of the consequences of speaking out become tools used by perpetrators to keep abuse hidden.

The reality too is that many of those who also find their voices unheard in other aspects of public life, such as people who are disabled, can find themselves doubly hidden when it comes to being able to speak out about abuse.

According to public health England, in their report, ‘disability and domestic abuse,’ women who experience anxiety in their daily life are over 4 times more likely to experience domestic abuse. Women who experience depression are also over 2 times likely to experience domestic abuse. People with some form of disability, including learning disabilities are significantly more likely to be physically abused, threatened with violence or sexually assaulted than that of people without disabilities. 11.3% of woman with a disability experienced abuse from another person other than their sexual partner compared to that of woman without a disability at 4.9%.  As the Guardian stated in one of their articles, ‘women with learning disabilities are hidden victims of domestic violence.’

As recent campaigns have shown, women and girls are not only hesitant to speak out but also have to fight to be heard. People with disabilities already have to face up to disability discrimination in public life. It’s so important not to lose sight of the fact that those who are already in a vulnerable place can find their struggles against discrimination exacerbated when compounded by sexual violence and abuse. For anyone dealing with these traumas, there are long term issues, which people will face on top of the challenges and disadvantage they already encounter.

Without additional funding for domestic violence services, prevention work, charities and refuges, Councils and Government cannot be said to be taking the issue seriously. Lip service is not enough to support the needs of those who want to come forward, or to provide services for those who do.

Greens react to Brighton and Hove Budget Proposals 2018-19

Brighton and Hove’s Labour Council leadership have now published the blueprint for the city’s budget (Policy, Resources and Growth Committee papers, available here: P&R Papers). Green Councillors have reacted to the announcements, raising concerns about the number of services and members of staff facing damaging cuts.
The Green Group Finance Lead, Councillor Ollie Sykes commented:

This is another salami-slicing budget from Labour that proposes cuts to many areas of council work: from services to vulnerable children and adults, services to families such as family coaches, through environmental health and licensing, to essential back room support in finance, audit and human resources. Presenting this as having no impact on front line services is disingenuous and ignores the council’s own impact assessments.

Obviously the principal blame for cuts lies with Conservative central Government for its political and economic mismanagement of the country, with perpetual austerity devastating public services and at the same time contributing to increasing demand. But Labour locally should be doing better. Greens over the past couple of years have blocked the worst of Labour’s expensive pet projects, for example £300k for councillor ward budgets. Greens have also found additional resources to protect essential services, to the tune of nearly £2m over the past couple of years. Pity Labour didn’t do that when Greens were in power. Our interest will always be to put the city first.

It’s a disappointing budget that we will be scrutinising closely over the next few weeks with an aim to propose positive changes. Fundamentally we think it makes sense for central government to provide a decent level of funding to local government; in the absence of movement there we will do what we can at a local level.”

 

Green Group Convenor Councillor Phélim Mac Cafferty added:

We are appalled that while local Labour held a press conference to inform journalists about the budget, opposition Councillors were kept in the dark until this afternoon. Not one Councillor from the Labour administration is quoted in the council’s budget press release on the city’s finances. It might be Labour’s budget – but they are ashamed to put their name to it.

“The budget picks up where last year’s left off. Of the 80 redundancies that the Labour administration are proposing our understanding is that 18 of those are compulsory. That for Greens is an absolute red line on any budget and we had not one compulsory redundancy in any of the Green budgets.

“Although Labour have been fast to downplay the impact of their budget, a closer look it reveals that cuts will take big lumps out of our communities:

DIGITAL EXCLUSION

“The Revenues and Benefits department is attempting to move online but I am worried about people being excluded because they simply don’t have any internet access. According to Age UK 3.8 million people aged 65+ have never used the internet.”

ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR

“Money that was used to support communities to fight anti-social behaviour and hate crime is now proposed to be cut.”

HOMELESSNESS

“Despite all of the rhetoric from Labour on the chronic problem of homelessness their budget proposes cuts to frontline staff in the Housing department. According to the council’s own Equality Impact Assessment this will ‘impact on groups such as families with dependent children or pregnant women.’

SEXUAL HEALTH CUTS

“There are huge cuts to things like chlamydia screening, which is the most common Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) among young people. While we know already that a push to make cuts and move to so-called ‘self testing’ will result in higher levels of Sexually Transmitted Infection and HIV- which in a city with some of the highest levels of STIs is completely unacceptable. We are very alarmed to hear Labour’s cuts in this area might put the Brighton Station Health Centre clinic at risk.”

CUTS TO CHILDREN’S SERVICES

“Similar to last year, again our children and young people are expected to take a hit for Labour’s budget:

“There are serious threats to things like home to school transport. Regardless of income families could be expected to contribute to the cost of travel for pupils.

“Early help for families and young people with complex mental health needs is being hit with family coach posts proposed for cuts. These are people who work with families who need help early on, who do not qualify for social work support.

“Children centre groups are being cut, which has an undue impact on the city’s BAME communities and women who use them most – groups who are already being disproportionately affected by cuts across all of our public services.

“As a city with a disproportionate high number of kids in care, we have to do everything in our power to look after them. But Labour is cutting the budget that supports foster carers to adopt children. We should all be worried that the budget Equality Impact Assessment says that cuts in this area will deliver an “insufficient budget to appropriately financially support new adopters coming forward.”

 

“So behind the rhetoric, Labour’s budget will be really damaging to some of our most oppressed communities.We will be looking in much more detail at the budget proposals and preparing a fuller analysis in the coming weeks.”

 

You can view the Impact assessments of the budget plans here: http://phantom.brighton-hove.gov.uk/Published/C00000912/M00006705/$$Supp28021dDocPackPublic.pdf

Greens on Autumn statement: “The best way to solve our housing crisis is to let our Council build.”

It is bizarre at best – and cruel at worst – that councils can borrow to build a swimming pool or a hotel, but not for desperately-needed homes, writes Councillor Phélim Mac Cafferty on the upcoming Autumn budget 

November 22nd is the Autumn Statement. It is vital that the Government takes this opportunity to deal urgently with the housing crisis as it is hitting Brighton and Hove.

And we need strong action. Since 2010, the number of people under the age of 45 who can afford their home has fallen one fifth. More is being spent today throughout England and Wales on repairs of homes than on building new homes. Escalating rents have meant that the biggest cause of homelessness is evictions in the private rented sector. Just last week we were reminded through Shelter’s report, ‘Far From Alone,’ that 1 in 69 people in Brighton and Hove are homeless. Our city is ranked 20th of UK cities for homelessness, surpassing many London councils.

So called ‘affordable’ housing is too often anything but. National planning laws embrace so-called “developer viability” and cause huge concerns to us. Developers hide behind ‘viability assessments’ to protect their profit margins and have meant that in just 11 councils they contributed to 79% fewer affordable homes. Yet the truth is that ways to fix the housing crisis are being ignored. The Government continues to block Councils from borrowing to build more genuinely affordable housing. Homes lost under the failed ‘Right to Buy’ scheme are not replaced like for like. There are very few ways we can force developers to publish their profits when they claim they can’t build more affordable housing.

Green Councillors have been lobbying through the body that represents councils- the Local Government Association- to try and fix the broken housing market. That work has been ongoing all the time I have been elected but has intensified since the government launched its Housing White Paper in the spring. Locally we have been busy too: fighting successfully for lower rents on Council homes, putting more money in the pot to re-buy housing we lost, and to create additional night shelters for rough sleepers.

Local Green Councillors are encouraging others to pledge to ‘do all they can to end homelessness.’ Picture from Brighton and Hove Housing Coalition

The best way to solve the housing crisis is to let our Council build. It is bizarre at best – and cruel at worst – that councils can borrow to build a swimming pool or a hotel, but not for desperately-needed homes. Especially at a time when interest rates for council borrowing have been so low, we need to be able to invest in a new generation of council homes fit for the 21st century.

Greens say that the Government must take the opportunity presented in the Autumn Statement to let councils keep 100% of the receipts of homes sold under the failed ‘Right to buy.’ Councils must once again be able to provide homes to those on low incomes.

The housing crisis is an urgent priority but any new homes must be affordable, in the right places, and have adequate infrastructure and services. The Budget must deliver powers and fiscal incentives for councils to build our local economy. Last year more than 475,000 new homes in England and Wales had planning permission but are yet to be built and that means we also need powers at a local level to make sure developers build out the housing schemes they have planning consent for.

We will be following the details as they are announced on Wednesday. Two years ago, after criticising the Green Councillors for presenting a letter to Government ministers demanding a better deal for our council as an “empty gesture”, it has been interesting to watch Labour leader of the Council Warren Morgan now sending a letter to…Government ministers. The new funding he speaks of is of course desperately needed, as indeed it was two years ago. But when it comes to the Conservative Government, we don’t have the ‘shared goals’ that he refers to – or any gratitude for their work so far. And instead of accepting corrosive changes to our NHS and seeking more funding for ‘Sustainable Transformation Plans,’ Greens want to oppose them. The Government must provide better support in their budget to local people and to our city – but, on the evidence so far, we won’t get it by asking them nicely.

Whilst we remain hopeful that the Government will act, we must be determined that if they don’t, we will continue to lobby for sufficient funding and powers that tackle the housing crisis and actually make a difference for local residents. If there are concessions around housing in the next budget, the success will lie with campaigners and those lobbying hard to get the Government to wake up and listen.

Phélim Mac Cafferty is the convenor of the Green Group of Councillors in Brighton and Hove and ward Councillor for Brunswick and Adelaide

Events in our city need to pay back to our communities and respect our environment

Greens propose new sustainability criteria for city events, but Labour Councillors vote down proposals and idea to improve funding for parks and open spaces

Labour Councillors have rejected Green proposals for a fairer fee structure for events coming to the city that would have improved funding for our parks and open spaces.

Speaking at a meeting of Brighton and Hove City Council’s Tourism, Development and Culture Committee, Green Councillors Phélim MacCafferty and Tom Druitt said it was time that private events coming to the city contributed more to the community and to the environment. But Labour Councillors rejected the Green proposals for a fairer events policy, criticising them for being ‘too long’.

Green Councillors raised the examples of other Councils such as Haringey and Oxford, who levy an ‘Environmental Impact Charge’ to account for the impact large scale events have on the city including large amounts of non-recyclable waste and damage to parks and open spaces. Greens want to see this charge introduced in Brighton, with the funding ringfenced to support the many ‘Friends of’ associations who help to maintain the quality of open spaces.

Damage on Brunswick lawns

Repeated events can affect the quality of parks and open spaces – with little done to repair the damage

Councillor Mac Cafferty raised concerns that in some cases profit-making festivals on Hove Lawns could be charging double the cost of the fee paid to the Council to run just one stall, whilst measures to ensure the parks were returned to their original state are clearly not working.

Speaking after the meeting, Green Spokesperson for Tourism, Development & Culture Cllr Tom Druitt said,

“Residents have raised a number of concerns about some of the events held in the city, ranging from the direct impact in terms of noise, rubbish, and the closure of footpaths and cycle paths to the cumulative impact of the events on our parks and open spaces. Moreover, it is clear that different event organisers pay different amounts for very similar events.

“It is a crying shame that Labour voted against our proposals to address these issues, seemingly for no reason other than because they were Green proposals. In doing so they have thrown away the opportunity to create a fair and transparent fee structure for events that would have improved funding for our parks and open spaces.”

Councillor Phélim Mac Cafferty added:

“A much clearer charging schedule in B&H is needed, where we’re not curtailing community or arts events but also not being completely ripped off by events which are run solely for profit for someone else. Local Labour Councillors voted against our proposal for fairer events for Brighton & Hove that pay back to the community and respect our environment, for example by not leaving trails of plastic waste.

“In my own ward of Brunswick and Adelaide, whilst residents are very good about events, there is virtually no occasion where residents have had not their lives disrupted by events on Hove Lawns. Our open spaces are taken away from our communities, and the small amount that is charged by the City Council goes nowhere near mitigation of the impact they cause.”  

Shame on the dinosaurs on the East Sussex Pension Fund (ESPF) Board

divest now

The illogical practice of Councils investing in fossil fuel companies must stop now, writes Brighton and Hove Green Party Councillor Louisa Greenbaum

Divestment from fossil fuels is a powerful and important step towards halting climate change and yet in the two years since the Paris Accord, the percentage of funds invested by Local Authorities in fossil fuels has not significantly changed, in contrast with the good progress made in other areas of public life such as universities, faith organisations and cities.

Brighton and Hove is sadly no exception to this trend. The Green Group of Councillors put forward a motion in 2015 calling on the East Sussex Pension Fund (ESPF) to divest, but frustratingly and astonishingly this received no support from our Labour or Conservative colleagues at the time. Fast forward two years, and the Labour group put forward the same motion, which this time passed, but the ESPF, although they paid lip service to considering the climate impact of its investments by commissioning a two-page report, have done precisely nothing.

Why? Well, where there are fossils there are dinosaurs, and there is a certainly a whiff of the stone-age about the six representatives who make up the ESPF Pensions Board.

So, for the sake of the dinosaurs, let’s go over again why divestment is a no-brainer.

Perhaps they need reminding of the impacts of climate change:

  • Higher temperatures have already led to an increase in heat-related deaths and illnessrising seas, increased storm intensity
  • One-fourth of the Earth’s species could be headed for extinction by 2050 due to changing habitats and competition for resources.
  • Sea level rise from climate change could displace tens of millions of people.
  • Climate change is making floods, fires and droughts more frequent and severe.
  • In 2003 extreme heat waves caused more than 20,000 deaths in Europe and more than 1,500 deaths in India. In addition to heat-related illness, climate change will increase the spread of infectious diseases, mainly because warmer temperatures allow disease-carrying insects, animals and microbes to survive in areas where they were once thwarted by cooler weather.
  • Climate change is affecting businesses and economies at home and around the world. If action is not taken to curb global carbon emissions, climate change could cost between 5 and 20 percent of the annual global gross domestic product, according to Nicholas Stern’s government review.

People from all levels and areas of society, from the top to the bottom, are realising that this can’t be allowed to continue. As Pope John Paul said, “Any harm done to the environment is harm done to humanity.” “Human beings,” he said, are “not authorized to abuse the planet, much less to destroy it.” So, what can be done?

One of the fastest moving areas in which climate change is being challenged is the Divest-Invest movement, which now represents a staggering $2.6 trillion shift in investment behaviour all over the world.

When the Rockefeller fund announced a few years ago that it was divesting the 7% of its fund connected fossil fuels, the movement went mainstream.  What these groups have all understood is that moving away from fossil fuels not only makes environmental sense, but also financial and ethical sense.

Environmental

The environmental case is the best rehearsed of the arguments in favour of the divestment from fossil fuels. 80% of the world’s fossil fuel reserves MUST remain unburned if we are to contain the rise in global temperature to 2%. We don’t have a hope in hell of achieving this if we don’t slam on the brakes. We simply don’t have time to change down through the gears and come gently to a stop over the course of a decade. The damage will be done, and we will be on an irreversible path with disastrous and fatal consequences.

We are actively contributing to global warming by investing in fossil fuels and it needs to stop now.

Economic

But this isn’t just a green issue – it’s also a financial one. The 80% of ‘unburnable’ fossil fuel reserves run a high risk of becoming a ‘stranded’ or worthless asset and a poor investment.

While climate legislation that limits fossil fuel extraction is a considerable driver for stranding these assets (which is why the fossil fuel industry is lobbying so hard against climate legislation), there are economic and physical as well as regulatory factors.

These include the falling price of oil against the increasing cost of extraction through more extreme environments or extraction techniques and the rise and rise of renewable energy.

Either fossil fuels stay in the ground and banks and commercial organisations lose billions writing off these “stranded assets,” or irreversible climate change will threaten human life as we know it. It’s that simple.

In the words of the Rockefeller heirs: “We are quite convinced that if he (John D Rockefeller) were alive today, as an astute businessman looking out to the future, he would be moving out of fossil fuels and investing in clean, renewable energy.”

It’s what Mark Carney, the Governor of the Bank of England, called ‘the Tragedy of the Horizon’ in his speech to Lloyds of London. His speech examined the impact that climate change would have on financial stability and I quote, “We don’t need an army of actuaries to tell us that the catastrophic impacts of climate change will be felt beyond the traditional horizons of most actors – imposing a cost on future generations that the current generation has no direct incentive to fix.”

Surely, with this huge weight of knowledge behind us, it is the moral duty of anyone in public life, and in positions of authority, to show leadership on this issue of global and historic significance.

Shame on the dinosaurs.

Greens and local campaigners call for a ‘plastic free’ city

Greens urge Council to ‘go plastic free’ and encourage traders, residents and businesses to do the same in a bid to reduce damage plastic waste causes the environment and public health


The Green Group of Councillors and local campaigners [quoted below] are calling on the Council to take serious action on plastic waste in Brighton and Hove.

Ahead of a meeting of Full Council on 2nd November, the Green Group are urging the Council to take decisive action on single-use plastics (SUP) such as bottles, plastic cups and straws, that are used just once before being thrown away and are not widely recycled.

The Green Group are also hoping that all parties will support a call to work with residents, businesses and local traders to set up a ‘Plastic Free Network,’ that builds on the best practice of organisations in the city already phasing out the use of plastics, to support people in making the transition to more sustainable alternatives.

Over 56 venues in Brighton and Hove have signed up to the ‘Plastic Free Pledge’, a campaign to limit, or remove, many single-use plastics from their business, such as plastic straws.

Only 14 percent of plastic packaging is ever recycled or re-used and like many other Councils, Brighton and Hove only has the facilities to recycle plastic bottles. With recent studies showing that plastics are now present in samples of British tap water, and present in a third of all fish caught off the British coastline, the Greens have also raised the alarm about the role Brighton and Hove has to play in preventing plastics from entering the ocean.

Local campaigners Claire Potter and Jake Arney, co-founders of the Plastic Free Pledge, have commented on the issue. Jake said:

“Plastic straws were the first target of the Plastic Free Pledge, however we are already helping organisations to look at their single-use plastic waste in other areas. Whether it is plastic cutlery, takeaway containers or coffee cups, there are viable alternatives available. We don’t hate plastic, we hate the wasteful misuse of plastic and the damage it causes.”

Claire Potter added:

A recent report by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation states that if we carry on in this throwaway nature, by 2050 there will be a greater weight of plastics in the ocean than fish. Plus we are yet to outlive a single piece of plastic – unless we have incinerated it, every piece of plastic we have ever created is still on Earth. We need to use and value plastic more highly – single use-plastic needs to be removed from our convenience lifestyles and replaced by for more sustainable alternatives, such as reusable containers instead.”

Councillor Phélim Mac Cafferty, who is proposing the motion for the Green Group of Councillors, commented:

“A plastic straw – used just once before being thrown away – can take up to 600 years to degrade. This and other single-use plastics in fact break down into smaller fragments, which studies now unequivocally show are strangling the life in our seas, entering our food chain and even our water supply, affecting our health too.

“The Green Councillors are calling on our city to lead by example on this scourge of plastic waste. We want to phase out the use of these unnecessary single-use plastics in all Council buildings, including in our purchasing and supply chain, and to champion alternatives. But plastics don’t just damage the environment; the waste costs us billions a year.  

“As a coastal city we all know about the beauty of our seas. But our seas are incredibly fragile so the time for action cannot come soon enough. We are also a city full of trailblazing organisations who we can learn from, and who already have advice on how they have reduced plastic usage and waste in their own business models.

“We are hoping all of the political parties are aware of the need to take decisive action on this issue and can come with us on what is perhaps the most important environmental issue of our time.”

Proposals to reduce single-use plastics will be heard by the meeting of Brighton and Hove full Council on November 2nd.

 

Notes…

Unnecessary (i.e. excluding medical items) Single-Use Plastics (SUP) used once before disposal e.g. bottles, cups and straws, are not widely recycled. Studies from Columbia University show SUPs can take up to 600 years to degrade, breaking into fragments that cause damage to the environment and permeate the food chain. Recent studies found that 72% of U.K tap water samples were contaminated with plastic fibres, and a third of all fish caught off the British coast contained plastic.

The Plastic Free Pledge encourages organisations and individuals to reduce SUP waste https://plasticfreepledge.com/ A petition calling on the Council to issue guidelines to local businesses on plastic reduction is here: http://bit.ly/2gtwqFC and a petition calling on Government to reduce and end SUPs here: http://bit.ly/2xSFLhs

Several businesses and organisations in Brighton and Hove have already implemented plastic free alternatives, such as Brighton Catering Supplies, Silo, HisBe supermarket and The Tempest Inn.